Saturday, September 13, 2008

The Issue of Maximum Compensation

There are occasional caps on judgments depending upon state laws.

Maximum compensation is often discussed when it comes to filing a lawsuit. Often, many television advertisements that feature legal services will discuss the maximum compensation that one might be able to receive for a lawsuit. Now, most people assume the maximum compensation refers to the most money they can acquire based on their own personal pursuit. In other words, it is the plaintiff who decides what the maximum compensation will be.

Well, this is the notion at least in theory. In reality, the plaintiff must be grounded in absolute reality when it comes to receiving maximum compensation. If you have been injured in a construction site accident and the injury results in ten stitches above your eye, then you are not likely to receive a multimillion dollar judgment. Yes, there will be those who will seek a multimillion dollar judgment but they may be somewhat deluded. After all, the severity of the injury just does not warrant such a huge payoff.

There are many factors that go into deciding what maximum compensation should be. Essentially, the extent of the injuries will determine maximum compensation. If you have been severely injured then your claim for damages will be higher than if you were slightly injured. Also, seeking damages is not always punitive. That is, one may sue to recoup financial expenditures. If your medical bills have been covered by insurance, you probably will not be awarded any compensation for medical bills. After all, your bills have been paid.

Now, none of these statements are put forth in order to be downbeat or cynical. They are simply provided in order to be expanded upon the reality of the situation. You do want to be grounded in reality when and your Philadelphia lawyer you are filing a lawsuit. Otherwise, you may find yourself extremely disappointed at the outcome.

No comments: